Did something happen in the news that we're suddenly pushing gay rights with extra fervor? I didn't think it was gay rights week or something, but then again I keep forgetting my own birthday is next week. Did someone say/do something stupid? Yargh, I need to keep up with the news more. About the only thing I've heard so far is the Amish shooting, which is heart breaking.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:15 pm (UTC)I would guess that's what the meme is about.
Oh!!! Also, some creep on mediaminer is reporting all slash stories for any infraction. Could be a retaliation against that.
*shrugs*
Also, as a reminder, your birthday is next week.^^ In case you've forgotten again.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:20 pm (UTC)Ah, elections. That would explain it.
d00d, I wish I had so much free time in my life I could spend it combing mediaminer for stories to report.
Heh. I'm actually only remembering it now b/c I wound up with 30+ drabbles to write and should probably get cracking ^^;;;
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 01:40 am (UTC)And I didn't know about the mediaminer thing o_O Good lord
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 01:44 am (UTC)Ja, as Maderr said, who has the time?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 03:34 am (UTC)So sorry to bother you, but hello, I've decided you are awesome.
(and sorry maderr for sort of spamming your journal)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 04:26 pm (UTC)You friend me, I'll fried you, kiddo!
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:32 pm (UTC)Is everyonen in this country a closet voyeur?
Granted, they probably shouldn't have been exchanging im's of a 'lurid nature' on the clock but sheesh.
I need to go back and read this more carefully, I started laughing too hard.
You know when some of us are in the mood for smut, we just read/watch porn. We don't start major scandals. Man, that requires too much goddamn work. Reading porn is tons easier.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:39 pm (UTC)This article is making my head hurt.
So, Sammikins, tell me if I'm following.
This Foley guy exchanged improper but mostly harmless emails with a page (and I have yet to see how old this page was...). Okay, they slappedh is wrist. Now, ever so conveniently right around the elections, the newspapers (or was it a news show?) decide to reveal all the lurid, nasty aims this dude and the page exchanged (on work comps! st00pid! Boys, think with the big head!)
BUT the investigation being launched isn't whether or not Foley and the Page were actually misbehaving, or whether or not Foley crossed too many lines, but is in fac about why Hastert didn't go ape shit on Foley's ass. "We're investigating you for not properly investigating a case of man/boy fooling around on office time even though they guy you asked about it said the matter had been dealt with"
Or did I start reading too fast again?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:42 pm (UTC)Oh, wait. They are investigating Foley...who is apparently an alcoholic? With a taste for bishounen. Huh.
This is news how? Shouldn't this sort of shit be kept lowkey?
Stars, keep me away from fsking politics.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:49 pm (UTC)Yeah, I'm follwing now. Always slow on this shit, me. All I see is the huge fsking mess that everyone makes of it. Stars, I really hope Hastert gets to punch someone.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 05:17 am (UTC)This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-03 11:45 pm (UTC)B) The information was leaked first to the press anyone. That's how this all broke, anyway. The Dems are saying Hastert (and pretty much the right) knew about it long ago, but were trying to keep it under wraps and keep it from coming out until after the elections.
C) Hastert's saying, "fuck you very much; I knew shit about this so much as a week ago." And he's bent. He wants to know knew about it (and thus leaked it to the press), and why whoever it was went to the press first instead of the authorities. He also wants to know how long this person knew about it before deciding to leak it to the press.
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-03 11:48 pm (UTC)A) Ah, yes, that would be a problem. Though by the same token, why the fucking hell was the kid (up, answered my own question) replying? Still, bad Foley.
B & C) Gotcha. I hope Hastert gets to punch someone. Hopefully a democrat.
D) Foley is a dumbass, or sounds like one. Just as an aside.
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-03 11:50 pm (UTC)Politics in general are scuzzy. *makes face* I hate that when you vote, it's pretty much a race to vote for the person who's the least jackass-like because they're all jackasses. >_>
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-03 11:53 pm (UTC)Iiiinteresting. What a debacle. People make such big deals about sexual harassment programs and shit so people are protected in situations like this...yet ultimately nothing is ever satisfactorily done.
Politics and business, man. I hate them both.
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-03 11:55 pm (UTC)Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 12:05 am (UTC)Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 12:12 am (UTC)Whatever they're drinking, man, I want no part of it. I prefer the stuff I drink; all I get is giggly and then sleepy.
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 12:43 am (UTC)Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 12:51 am (UTC)Sadly, few are as ruthlessly honest with themselves as you, my darling Skylark. If they were, I don't think they'd be politcians, business men, or even movie stars...most of them, anyway.
It's the same reason my asshat IAM gets away with the shit he's done, making a pass at me probably one of his lesser crimes from the stories I've heare, is that the alcohol made him do it!
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 12:54 am (UTC)Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 12:56 am (UTC)Sadly, logic never failed to sway anyone before. Still, you should jot that down somewhere. It's quite quoatable.
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 01:00 am (UTC)Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 01:01 am (UTC)I just mean what you say is dead on - but it's one of those things people never think of until they hear it. Like not seeing the forest for the tress, though that's not *quite* right.
Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 01:06 am (UTC)Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 01:17 am (UTC)Re: This is what I know
Date: 2006-10-04 01:16 am (UTC)Re your IAM boss: Alcohol made him do it my ass. The fucking pervert. He thinks because he's older and higher up, that it's okay for him to do inappropriate shit like as long as he can claim that he did it because he was drunk. It's no excuse, and it makes him one hell of an icky person. But, I'm probably not saying anything you don't already know. ^_^;; Seriously, I really wanted to kick him in the balls when I saw the post where you'd written that. It's one thing when my dirty old men customers are hitting on someone ten or twenty years younger than them. They don't have any control over my job, my life, or anything that occurs in it except for the two or three minutes when I'm ringing them up. It's another thing entirely when it's a dirty old man that's your boss or your boss's boss. That's crossing a line.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 12:51 am (UTC)Heh. Thankfully. Heck, I think I'm probaby nicer drunk.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 01:44 am (UTC)It suxsuxsuxsux hiding it from everyone you work with.
Of course, the thought of finally becoming a civilian only to have to be just as careful is really depressing T_T
I should pay more attention to current events, yes? o_O;
Amish Shooting, tho.. did hear about that. Good god. That was insane.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-04 05:37 pm (UTC)Erm, does that make sense? And uh, sorry if this has already been expounded upon.