Now there's an interesting idea. Not my cup of tea, but I'm sure someone somewhere would like it, if they have not already used it. I've seen this episode of Good Eats before, it's on shrimp. One of the little blurbs they toss up says that some shrimp change sex from male to female after one year of sexual activity. That would be an interesting concept to play with - a species where they start out one gender, but after x number of years switch to the other. I wonder what the reasons for that would be?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 12:44 am (UTC)i dunno XD;
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 12:52 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_angelfish
XD
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 12:57 am (UTC)It gives me hope for our species....<3
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 01:04 am (UTC)Though if it's not, and just a time-based thing -- exactly once a year or whatever -- that'd be cool to play with. ^___^ Like, partner-wise. It'd probably be timed from the when they were born - a year later they change gender -- or maybe shorter intervals when they're younger, lengthening to a year long when they get past their teen years... but then you could play with male-male, male-female, and female-female pairings for all the same couple and I think that would be all kinds of interesting to play with. ^___^
Or I could just be rambling. must go to crash now, am deadz0r, but interesting. ^___^
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 01:21 am (UTC)Looking back, that's probably more than you really wanted to know and a bit off topic....blame it on my giant biology exam coming up.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 01:23 am (UTC)I meant more why it would exist in a human type society, but hey, the more information the better to come up with a reason ^_^ Some of those could apply, it just depends on the environment and other factors.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 01:30 am (UTC)Hey, maybe, over time we'd evolve this way too. Then, I do'no population decrease? Lord knows, we need it.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 02:05 am (UTC)No reasons really given other than blaming it on some buried gene.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 03:09 am (UTC)=)
Date: 2008-04-24 03:42 am (UTC)You see, your pondering reminded me of "Simoun," a shoujo-ai anime. I only watched 1 ep, but still remember it. This is what it says on Anime News Network, and I quote:
"On the world of Daituuriku, everyone is born female. To maintain a stable population, countries like the highly industrialized Shoukoku medically alter some of their population at birth to become male, while in Kyuukoku each person must decide during a special ceremony at age 17 what gender to assume as an adult."
So, there's high-tech involved and there's also divine power involved. Pick your choice. :D I guess you can create a tragic history or something similar, weaving a tale how males were wiped out in ancient time (like dinosaurs? O_O ). Us highly intellectual females later have to look for a way to cope... So, yeah... huh...
Uh, I know it's lame and quite cliché, but it just popped up in my head. ^^'''
Re: =)
Date: 2008-04-24 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 04:34 am (UTC)In a human setting, gender-switching would likely manifest as a form of adaptation if one half of the species was rendered incapable of procreation. Switching genders just for the heck of it does seem rather interesting though.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 04:57 am (UTC)I was really frustrated when writing it because of the awkwardness of pronouns and talking about the past. My main character was a 30 year old who had just turned female, which went along with being given a sort of year's paid vacation from regular clan work to go get pregnant by some foreign male (bring fresh dna back) and get the adventuresomeness out of her system so she could settle down to being a mommy and part of the bureaucracy afterward. What she does is go to a particular place where, when she was a 16 year old boy, he had through some trickery arranged to sire a child even though the father was officially listed as a more senior male. Having a female character reminisce about things they had dnoe while male quickly got horribly confusing, lol.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 11:21 pm (UTC)But anyway for my particular story it was important to see the same person in male and female phases because I wanted to look at parenting from both sides, and how the change from male to female was both a cause for grief (the character's lover was no longer attracted to them, the character could never top again, their life was half over) and a cause for joy (start of a new adventure, they could experience bearing a child, suddenly lots of males were eager to court them).
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 05:12 am (UTC)The ending, in retrospect, was rather annoying... not just because it turned out the aliens had been bioengineered to switch genders midlife (though that was pretty *headsmack*), but because it was brushed off as the doings of a "sect of perverts". That was it. Not environmental or social pressure, not some great plague, just a bunch of "icky perverts" deciding it would be way hot if they could experience both sides of the sexual equation. (Which, okay, yeah, it would be, but... oh well, I don't think transgendered people were on the radar at all at the time the story was written, so it could hardly be expected to address that.)
A real reason for this to happen could be pure population. If you can't change the birth rate (1 baby/female/time unit), a high mortality rate would lead to needing a higher percentage of women to birth babies before they die... and surviving long enough to turn male usually means better genes to pass on. You only need one man to have x babies/time unit, while you need x women to have x babies/time unit. Instead of the 50/50 ratio of fertile humans, you'd get something more like 80/20, living females vs. living males.
On the flip side, if you have a very high population, can't hammer birth control into people's heads, can't engineer enough space for everyone, and are too humanitarian to tolerate starvation, plagues, and forms of genocide, then you could bioengineer to start male and change over part or most of the way through a female's fertile years. Then surviving long enough to carry babies means better genes, and far fewer children.
Both of these seem rather a long shot, unless they came about naturally (in which case, the former seems much more likely than the latter in terms of actual species survival). Fertility treatments and medical care (for underpopulation); and creative maximization of food production, use of space, and birth control campaigns (for overpopulation) would be easier on the whole than changing an entire species over to genderswitching.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 08:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-24 10:50 pm (UTC)But of course I could be remembering it a lot differently to how it was written!