Having just told Logos
Jan. 4th, 2006 07:25 pmThat I generally am not lazy in my research, I am now going to be extremely lazy.
WTF color are Macgyver's eyes? And his first name is Angus? Poor guy.
I guess I need Bond's eyes too, hmm. *wanders off to look more stuff up*
Also must make an icon for this. Just because.
*Edit*
Okay, this story is going to be a lot harder than I thought. WTF do I let you people talk me into?
<3
*Edit the Second*
I'm no MacGyver. There is no way I can stop bad bad things with candy bars.
WTF color are Macgyver's eyes? And his first name is Angus? Poor guy.
I guess I need Bond's eyes too, hmm. *wanders off to look more stuff up*
Also must make an icon for this. Just because.
*Edit*
Okay, this story is going to be a lot harder than I thought. WTF do I let you people talk me into?
<3
*Edit the Second*
I'm no MacGyver. There is no way I can stop bad bad things with candy bars.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:34 am (UTC)Wait a ... are you writing Macgyver and James Bond slash?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:36 am (UTC)Thank you! Six two? Wow, tall. Need to check ol Jamie's height then. Hmmm...that would be fucking funny if Bond was shorter.
That would be a yes.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:14 am (UTC)That's really funny. And why is over six feet a disqualifier?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:38 am (UTC)They can't stand out, and every Bond does. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:13 am (UTC)So they're the same height. I think that's even funnier. Hehehe.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:33 am (UTC)> That would be a yes.
. . .
**imagines an end result of Mr. Bond - James Bond - duct-taped to the bedframe, helpless, and enjoying it.** X D
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:35 am (UTC)It so vastly amuses me that *everyone* immediately goes to James getting duct-taped to the bed. I guess it just goes to show some crossovers are meant to be ^_^
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:39 am (UTC)(♥♥♥♥ MacGyver)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:35 am (UTC)That sounds yummy.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:39 am (UTC)Don't it just?! O_o
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 02:02 am (UTC)Oh Sarah's going to have pretty dreams tonight XD XD
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 02:23 am (UTC)Or did you mean you would too? :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:42 am (UTC)Brosnan was actually the 5th Bond (there was one between Sean and Roger whose name we shall not speak - George Lazenby). 6th if you count the old Peter Seller's Casino Royale (which I don't as it wasn't an *official* Bond movie).
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:46 am (UTC)Ooo, right, the eminently forgettable George Lazenby. I think his is the one Bond movie I've not seen. And likely never will.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:56 am (UTC)I actually did think it had a good story and a great shocker ending. I don't recall what the story was, but I recall at least being shocked at the end.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:51 am (UTC)Who's George Lazenby?
And how is Casino Royale not an official bond movie? That's the name of the first book - did they do the movie all wrong or something?
Casino Royale
Date: 2006-01-05 01:07 am (UTC)Plot summary/description from IMDB:
"Sir James Bond (enjoying his retirement), a spy from the old school (a good spy is a pure spy) is called back to service by the death of "M" and the imminent collapse of civilization. The opposition tries to compromise him, but even as nubile young agents are thrown at him, he remains above it all. Going beyond parody to sillyness, every agent is renamed James Bond, 007 to confuse the enemy, including Woody Allen who plays, Little Jimmy Bond."
So as you can see, Casino Royale was simply a parody of Bond (kind of like Austin Powers) which came out 5 years after Dr. No. Thusly, the new Casino Royale will actually be based off the book and can possibly be considered not a remake ^^
It also wasn't an Albert R. Broccoli produced Bond film which all of them were up through GoldenEye (he died).
Re: Casino Royale
Date: 2006-01-05 01:08 am (UTC)Gotcha. Thankee ^_^
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:53 am (UTC)Eh. I'm going with the idea of Bond, really. I mean the character is pretty flexible, may as well work with that rather than a specific incarnation.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:31 am (UTC)Um, you let us talk you into it because you love us and because the idea wouldn't let you go anyway, and it is just easier to blame us... *grins*
Gimme, gimme MacGyver slash! O_o Did I say that??
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:39 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macgyver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_bond
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:54 am (UTC)^__^ I thought of that not long after I posted, though it took me forever to find James' physical description.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:46 am (UTC)You have now melted me down into a happy puddle.
__^_^__ = mailepuddle
Eeeeee! Eeeee! Bond/MacGyver!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 01:53 am (UTC)One day I'm going to do something completely random that everyone will hate, and I won't know what to do with myself.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 02:02 am (UTC)Mm...duct-tape... *cough*
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 02:07 am (UTC)You had to bring up the Rice Krispies. Man I was on crack, coming up with that.
Heh. I guess the end of my story has been decided. There really is no way to go but Bond duct-taped to a bed.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 05:41 am (UTC)Or have them in a typical Bond-gets-captured-by-bad-guy-and-strapped-to-laser situation and McGyver tries to help and Bond gets out anyway?
I can just SO see Bond and McGyver battling it out--high tech vs. slap-and-dash. Then after that, hooking up over beers.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 05:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 02:05 am (UTC)Megan? She err... followed me home.. can I keep her? I promise to feed her!!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 09:56 am (UTC)*laughs*